Types of Evidence in DC Domestic Violence Cases

Types of evidence in DC domestic violence cases can vary depending on the charges that a defendant might be facing. When someone is facing a domestic violence assault charge, testimony might be limited to only testimony from an accuser and testimony from the person. Evidence without any physical injuries might be limited to simply two versions of an event when the prosecutor cannot prove that there is no reason to doubt their version of events. This often means that they have proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt. The prosecutors bear that burden of convincing a judge that there is no reason to doubt their version. Proving DC domestic violence evidence can be confusing, contact an experienced lawyer immediately.

Prosecution of Evidence

If a prosecutor has not proven evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, even if a judge believes that maybe it is likely that a prosecutor’s evidence is correct evidence or probably true, then the judge would be required by law to acquit the defendant and, in some domestic violence cases, there are no additional witnesses beyond an accuser and a defendant.

There can be many different types of evidence in DC domestic violence cases. Sometimes, that evidence can include photographs of injuries. Sometimes, it can include phone records of an accuser or a defendant. The types of evidence depend on the nature of the charges.

If there is a person who is facing domestic violence charges, the attorney would want to know about the history between them and the accuser. In that history, there could be evidence of an accuser’s motivation to falsify or fabricate evidence.

History of Evidence

The history of evidence for domestic violence cases can involve information about contentious custody battles between the person and the accuser. It could include problems with extended family members. It could include any number of motivations for an accuser to falsify or fabricate evidence or indicators of lack of credibility on the part of an accuser. This kind of information is often relevant to showing that a prosecutor cannot prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. The lack of credibility or a motivation to lie could create serious doubts as to how reliable their testimony is.

Along the same lines, when representing individuals facing domestic violence cases, an attorney would want to conduct their own investigation, seeking out possible witnesses who may have seen an alleged fight take place, for example, and who could corroborate the person’s version to show that the accuser was the one who started the fight and the individual was defending themselves. Witnesses who interacted with the person or with the accuser immediately before or after an alleged altercation or some other allegation of a crime could have all the information on what happened and could be able to challenge the government’s witnesses who they believed to be used to prove a crime.

What is Phone-Based Evidence?

Types of evidence in DC domestic violence cases can include text messages between the individual and an accuser might be relevant. Voicemails or emails could also be relevant. It is important that a person does not delete any information like that. They should not delete text messages or emails or voicemails. These can all be used as evidence in their favor when facing a domestic violence charge. In some situations, there could be video surveillance in areas that could be helpful in challenging the prosecutor’s version of events.

Seeking an Attorney

It is important to have a professional domestic violence attorney with the ability to conduct a thorough investigation to seek out witnesses, video footage. An individual needs a lawyer who can subpoena phone records or other kinds of documents to challenge the prosecutor’s case, challenge their witnesses, and create the reasonable doubt necessary to seek out an acquittal in a trial. It is important to talk to a lawyer who understands the types of evidence in DC domestic violence cases.